What should we pay attention to during the salt spray test according to IEC and ASTM standards?

The salt spray test is an essential technique for evaluating the corrosion resistance of materials and coatings, and it is carried out in line with standards such as those established by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (American Society for Testing and Materials).

When conducting a salt spray test in accordance with the requirements of the IEC and ASTM, there are various critical considerations that must be made, including the following:

  1. Test Circumstances The test conditions, which include temperature, relative humidity, and salt content, need to be regulated and kept within certain limitations, as outlined in the applicable standards. These limits may be found in the relevant standards. In addition, the calibration of the testing chamber need to be performed on a regular basis.
  2. Preparing the Specimens For the test, the specimens that are going to be examined should first be cleaned and conditioned in accordance with the applicable requirements. This will guarantee that the examination will provide accurate and reliable results.
  3. Duration of the Test The duration of the test should be stated in the applicable standards, and it should be long enough to allow for the evaluation of the specimens' resistance to corrosion.
  4. Evaluation of Results The outcomes of the test should be reviewed in accordance with the applicable standards. This evaluation should take into account the kind, degree, and location of any corrosion that was found. It is recommended that a visual examination of the specimens be carried out, and any corrosion that is seen should be quantified and documented.
  5. Documentation of Results It is important that the results of the salt spray test be recorded and published. This documentation should include the test settings, specimens, and the results. For the purpose of facilitating an objective comparison of the outcomes of various studies, this documentation must to be exhaustive and precise.
  6. Inter-laboratory Comparisons: It is important to carry out inter-laboratory comparisons so that the findings obtained from various labs can be compared and interpreted in the same manner. This may be accomplished by taking part in inter-laboratory comparison programs or by exchanging specimens and findings with other labs. Both of these methods are viable options.
  7. Re-testing: Re-testing of specimens that have failed the salt spray test may be undertaken in order to validate the findings or to assess the efficiency of corrosion prevention measures. Re-testing may be performed for any of these reasons.

In conclusion, while conducting a salt spray test in accordance with IEC and ASTM standards, it is very necessary to pay close attention to the aforementioned criteria in order to guarantee the correctness, reliability, and comparability of the findings.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are the differences of FMVSS 302, UL94 and IEC60695 for flammability test?

Image
The flammability of different materials, such as plastics and other materials used in items such as automobile interiors, electronic devices, and electrical appliances, is evaluated using a number of different standards. Some of these standards are FMVSS 302, UL 94, and IEC 60695. Nevertheless, there are a number of important distinctions between these standards: FMVSS 302 is a specialized standard that was designed for the automotive industry to analyze the flammability of materials used in car interiors. Its purpose is to measure the combustibility of these materials. The UL 94 standard is a more comprehensive regulation that assesses the combustibility of a variety of materials, including plastics, and has applications in a number of different sectors. IEC 60695 is a global standard that is used in the process of assessing the potential for electronic and electrical equipment to catch fire. Testing Procedures The flammability of materials is determined using a variety of testing ...
Read more
Image
125 Grounding Contact Test 125.1 Grounding receptacles having a 5-15R,5-20R，6-13R，6-20R，7-15R，14-15Ror 15-15R configuration are to be subjected to the tests in this section. 125.2 Previously untested devices are to be used. Each device is to be mounted in a flush device box, or as otherwise intended, with its face in a vertical plane. A nonmetallic faceplate is to be installed if intended. A solid 14 AWG (2.1 mm2) copper conductor is to be connected to the receptacle grounding terminal. GNGPL SB1610_AL 125.3 With the receptacle oriented to create the maximum contact displacement (possible distortion of contact affecting its contact ability), the test pin A. Figure 125.1 is to be fully inserted in the grounding contact. A 5 lb (2.27 kg) weight is to be gradually suspended form the test pin 6 inches (152 mm) from the face of the receptacle. The weight is to be applied for 1 minute, following which, the weight is to be removed. The application of the weight is to be repeated with the rece...
Read more
Image
Accessible parts of equipment with standard IEC 62368 General An accessible part of an equipment is a part that can be touched by a body part. For the purposes of dctermining an accessible part, a body part is represented by one or more of the specified test probes. Accessible parts of an equipment can include parts behind a door, panel, removable cover, etc. that can be opened without the use of a tool. Accessible parts do not include those that become accessible when floor standing equipment having a mass exceeding 40 kg is tilted. For equipment intended for building-in or rack-mounting, or for subassemblies and the like for incorporation in larger equipment,accessible parts do not include those that are not accessible when the equipment or subassembly is installed according to the method of mounting or installation specified in the installation instructions. A part is considered accessible if the instructions or markings intended to be followed require that a person phys...
Read more